Clinical Data · Interoperability · Privacy

Is Your Data Stack Compliant?

Your Data Health is a healthcare-tech SWAT team for HTI-1 through HTI-4, USCDI v3/v4, and MHMDA privacy. Founded and led by Terry Virdell, our delivery team of senior FHIR engineers, QA architects, and privacy specialists deploys on day one.

  • Clinical logic validation (safety-critical data behaviors)
  • Privacy engineering validation (de-identification, access controls, PHI handling)
  • E2E EHR & EMR testing (interoperability workflows and edge cases)

TAP (Technical Audit Protocol): we test your implementation, identify failing criteria, and deliver a remediation plan with re-scan verification evidence, so you can prepare for ONC certification and surveillance with confidence.

Before certification

The pen-test before the certification audit. We find what Drummond, ICSA Labs, and SLI Compliance will find, while you still have time to fix it.

Pen-test rigor. Continuous compliance watch.

Starting at $7,500 (Starter Audit). Fixed-fee packages, scoped to endpoints and environments.

Technical diagnostics and evidence, not legal advice. Certification decisions remain with ONC-ACBs.

After you submit intake, our delivery team responds within one business day with a scoping call and a written SOW.

Who this is for

Three rooms, one audit standard

Different deadlines, different stakeholders, same technical bar. TAP speaks all three languages.

Payers

Survive the CMS interoperability deadlines

Patient Access, Provider Directory, and Prior Authorization APIs are watched. Surveillance findings hit your compliance scorecard and your provider contracts.

Outcome: citation-level findings against CMS-9115-F and CMS-0057-F, with a remediation backlog your engineering team can ship before the compliance date.

CMS-9115-F · CMS-0057-F · Da Vinci · CARIN Blue Button · state Medicaid & insurance mandates

See what failure costs →

Providers

Clinical safety regression coverage your QA team doesn’t have

Your EHR upgrades, your FHIR endpoints, your patient portals: when interoperability changes, clinical logic regressions slip through. That’s how patients get hurt.

Outcome: a defect-prevention framework rooted in 15 years of zero critical defects at Providence; evidence packet you can hand to your audit committee.

HTI-1 · USCDI v3/v4 · WA MHMDA · state breach notification · MEWS/SEPSIS-grade rigor

See what failure costs →

Series A–B startups

Survive the next data room, close the next round

Health-system procurement and Series B diligence both ask the same question: can your FHIR endpoint pass a real audit? A failed pilot or a flagged data room kills the round.

Outcome: board-ready summary your CTO hands to the audit committee, your CEO hands to investors, and your engineering team executes against on Monday.

HTI-1 · WA MHMDA · CCPA/CPRA · BIPA · investor diligence

See what failure costs →

We monitor every active federal and state regulation so you don’t have to. ONC, CMS, HHS OCR, WA MHMDA, CCPA/CPRA, BIPA, state breach notification, and emerging health-data privacy laws, tracked and updated as the rules change. See state laws →  ·  Regulations overview →

Deliverables (what you receive)

You get concrete artifacts you can hand to engineering, procurement, and leadership, not a generic checklist.

  • HTI readiness scorecard (0 to 100) plus pass or fail by requirement.
  • Evidence packet (logs, queries, configuration findings) suitable for procurement or corrective action response.
  • Remediation backlog (sprint tickets with acceptance criteria).
  • Re-scan after fixes (verification report with deltas).
Built for the audit committee, the data room, and Monday standup

Board-ready summary your CTO can hand to the audit committee, your CEO can hand to investors, and your engineering team can execute against on Monday. One artifact, three rooms.

Best fit

  • EHR vendors and health IT product teams
  • Payers facing CMS-9115-F or CMS-0057-F deadlines
  • Series A–B health-tech startups in pilot or diligence

Not a fit

  • Companies wanting us to build their FHIR server or infrastructure
  • Teams seeking legal opinions or legal representation
  • Generic SOC 2 work unrelated to healthcare mandates
Benchmarks: in public endpoint spot-checks (including reference endpoints and common servers like HAPI, Firely, and Smile), we see a wide spread of results. Common failure modes include SMART configuration gaps, authorization walls, and missing capability discovery. We will publish redacted examples as case studies as customer approvals come in.

What we validate

A focused audit that maps requirements to evidence, finds failure modes, and hands your team a remediation backlog you can execute.

Interoperability & certification readiness

HTI-1 through HTI-4, USCDI v3/v4, and FHIR behaviors that must hold up during procurement and surveillance.

  • US Core alignment spot-checks
  • Capability discovery and SMART failure modes
  • Evidence packet + scorecard

HTI & USCDI implementation guide →

Privacy engineering validation

We translate requirements into testable checks across de-identification pipelines, PHI handling, and access controls.

  • MHMDA engineering and DSI transparency posture
  • De-identification and masking controls
  • Audit-ready documentation

Compliance standards overview →

LEAN TEAMS

Milestone deployments

Our team drops in at milestone moments: pre-release reviews, investor diligence readiness, and remediation verification.

  • Architecture checkpoints
  • Pre-launch audits
  • Re-scan verification after fixes

Want the deeper context?

Read the Regulations overview, the HTI-1 through HTI-4 & USCDI v3/v4 guide, or explore the Regulatory Hubs.